"Stakes"

Jul. 6th, 2023 01:16 pm
phantomtomato: (Default)
[personal profile] phantomtomato

Thinking about the element of stakes within a story: high, low, no. I'm not a plot-driven writer and have no interest in becoming one at this point. I've been reactionary in the past and, as a result, described myself as writing no-stakes stories—but I don't think that's quite accurate anymore. Er, in the sense that I don't think it was ever accurate, and I now wouldn't apply the term to my writing, past or present.

What I am interested in doing is learning to define a set of low-stakes issues which are driving a story. It might just be my perspective as an outsider, but it usually feels like the stakes in a plotty story are laid out clearly at the start: Gideon the Ninth opens on the idea that for the Ninth House to survive, Harrrowhark must succeed in becoming a Lyctor, whatever that means; if the White Witch isn't defeated in The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe, then Narnia will remain in eternal winter and all the Pevensie children will probably die. High stakes: there's probably a chance of death involved. Easy! Obvious. Evil wins, or the nation ends, the bomb goes off, and so forth.

Low-stakes stories are harder to see from the outset, I think—even though this is what I tend to write, I don't usually start by defining the meaning of failure. Maybe it would help as part of the planning process for stories? On the one hand, being primarily driven by character arcs, I'm not as interested in the concept of failure. I don't typically think of their emotional endpoints as failing, no matter what they are, because the progression to get there was fun for me to write about. On the other, though, I wonder if it would help articulate motivations in the middle, as we've moved past the initial spark of the story premise and haven't yet entered the final slide towards the end.